Warning: This Is a Rights-Free Workplace

The article states about the frugal factor in the States. It sensitizes on the justice the workers in the States should be precondition. The article talks about how the workers in America are inured with injustice. This is shown well when the article starts by, If the laws of economics were enforced as strictly as the laws of physics, America would be a workers paradise. Visit the article in this affiliate http//www. barbaraehrenreich. com/workers functions. htm. Employee Rights in the Workplace The idea of employee rights involves many complex issues.An employees right to a workplace free of discrimination and harmful environmental factors is obvious. Yet, other(a) issues surrounding retirement, personal spirit, and communication monitoring are not as clear-cut. While employees may feel that they have the right to express their opinions and use trading communications while working, not only may they be fooling themselves but they are acting in a fashion that is unethical. While jobes do not have the right to control employee behaviors outside(a) of the workplace, they do have the right to monitor and control communications and employee actions during paid eon.As such, employees have the right to reason subject expectations in terms of communication, yet tidy sumnot (within limits) ethi listy demand a right to privacy, private communication, or personal expression while they are utilizing business property or on business time. Workplace privacy has been a hot issue in the concluding decade, as more and more workplaces incorporate email and Internet-use into the office environment. legion(predicate) employees now use email and the Internet daily, not to mention the name (Nord, McCubbins, & Nord, 2006).With high volumes of communicatio employee privacy rights in the workplace Introduction Often the issues regarding privacy rights in the workplace focuses on employee rights to privacy in the workplace . close to advocacies support employee righ ts and criticize the efforts of companies to monitor employees . However , despite the importance to harbor every employee s privacy , there should be a identification that Whether or not privacy is protected by law or contract , fostering a workplace culture where privacy is wanted and espected contributes to morale and mutual commit and makes good business sense . consequently , privacy is not limited to rights but also entails employees responsibility to verify that it is never abused and is not to the determent of the fellowship ( Privacy in the Workplace , 2005 Challenges for Employers Employers have the right and responsibility to monitor their place of business to protect themselves and their employees from invasion . The irony is that this can only be practical if an employer is able to monitor communications and exchanges .Therefore , for a company to be able to afford the protection that employees need , they must surrender in trust their privacy to the company As much as a company should not invade the rights of its employees , it has the equal responsibility of ensuring that its privacy and that of its employees are not divulged or used in any personal intent by other employees . According to Nyman (2005 , more companies are being held accountable by employees whose privacy was compromised in the workplace because of what is seen as a lack in its measures to ensure their privacy .Therefore , if employers are being held accountable for such situations , Nyman believes that they should be given enough power to protect themselves from such liabilities An example given by Nyman is the case between Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA ) and Integrated Information Systems (IIS The allegation was that the latter allowed its employees to infringe the copyrights of MP3 s that the employees divided up over the company s networks . The settlement of the suit with RIAA cost IIS a million dollars .Aside from the settlement , the company also faced a usual relations issue regarding the alleged sharing IIS main service is electronic transmission of copyrighted material It would be safe to assume that the employees were certified of the issues regarding sharing and despite the IIS did not allow for the behavior , the fact that it did croak cast liability over the company The issue is not so much as an issue of whether the company was responsible for the sharing of the s but rather that it happened over its network Security RealitiesTechnology has afforded the transfer of a significant amount of information over the wires and with that has increased the risk that not just sensitive data or even whole databases and programs can easily be transferred in that manner . At the same time , other technologies in imaging have also increased the transmit by which a person s privacy can be compromised . From the perspective of employees , this has allowed forIf the laws of economics were enforced as strictly as the laws of phys ics, America would be a workers paradise. The supply of most kinds of labor is low, relative to the demand, so each worker should be treated as a treasured asset, right? But there have been only grudging gains in wages over the last few years, and in the realm of gravitas and autonomy, a palpable decline.What we need is nothing less than a forward-looking civil rights movement this time, for American workers. Who will provide the leadership the Great Compromiser to be seen, but clearly the stakes go way beyond labor issues, as these are conventionally defined. We can hardly call ourselves the worlds pre-eminent democracy if large numbers of citizens spend half of their waking hours in what amounts, in plain terms, to a dictatorship.