Position Paper- Palliative vs Curative Care

According to the World Heath Organisation (WHO, 2011), Palliative c ar is an approach, which hires to modify quality of flavor-time of patients and families who be crippled with lifespan threatening unwellnesses. Alternatively, remedy care is an approach that aims to prolong life with technological advances and medicine. It seems that the better approach to health care, would be to better the quality of life as well as prolong life, through a combination of two cure and alleviatory care. The best approach to health care is a combination of twain(prenominal) curative and moderating care.Combining the best of life prolonging technological advances whilst maximising quality of life should be the net aim of all medical practiti whizrs. The basic endeavour should be to cure an undivided however, if the quality of life is impacted it may not be an well(predicate) or worthwhile process. This is the reason why in that respect is a necessary for the integration of both. By exercise set slightlyone of their disease or illness whilst concurrently giving them a high quality of life through mitigative intervention, the objective is achieved.This approach is more appropriate than choosing between palliative and curative, due to the blurred boundaries between what represents curative and what represents palliative care. The natural fertilise and the severity of the disease, and a better understanding of symptoms such as imposition, front the blurred boundaries. (Cooney, 2005). The definition between curative and palliative care are considered dichotomous. However, both methods are needed to achieve optimal results. There are many misconceptions that suggest an either-or method.This is heightened by Medicare policies and regulations, and equivalent requirements of some health plans and indemnity guidelines (Byock, 2000). Many do not understand that there is an option for both, which is the ultimate alternative. Within the health care system where c ure should be precious vastly, palliative is perceived as the second best option and is unless presented when there are no better options is available. However, the basic principle of palliative care stresses the value of consistent stability of care such as symptom management (Byock, 2000). redress care is directed towards seeking a cure for an existing disease or medical condition. Through technology and medicine it prolongs life. Paul Jewells (2005) article on the sanctity of life states that this notion of the sanctity of life is promoted as an ethical standard, a manoeuver to professional practice and legislated constraints. His article further suggests that medical practitioners are pass judgment to work in slipway that correspond to common social expectations and levelheaded restrictions. thereof, signifying that the main concern should be the wellbeing of the patient.Within the Australian medical checkup Associations code of ethics, it is stated that there is a righ t to preserve life, however, where death is deemed to be pending and where curative or life-prolonging treatment is absent, one must try to certify that death transpires with dignity and computer backup through palliative care (AMA, Code of Ethics, 2004). It is through the reasons listed above and a basic understanding of human rights that insist that all individuals should aim to be cured. Curative methods such as chem oppositeapy are expensive procedures.According to Simoens et, al. (2010), the smallest balance wheel of hospital costs are in the palliative care unit. For some this may be a motivation to choose palliative everywhere curative, however, the value of life is more important than the cost. Palliative care is as essential as curative because there is no point in curing a patient and then leaving them with a paltry quality of life. The aim of palliative care is to relive symptoms of ill patients and improve quality of life. Despite the technological advancements in me dicine, many illnesses elude cure.Thus it leaves terminally ill patients, and patients with chronic diseases with palliative care being a necessity (Doyle et, al. 20). Therefore palliative is passing important and possibly the except option for the treatment of those individuals. Palliative care specifically cares for those who are terminally ill focusing not on curing them but treating their symptoms, do them comfortable while hold inling their disoblige. It allows the patient to feel in control of their treatment and their quality of life.It also allows individuals and families to understand that dying is a popular stage and an inherent part of life, and to come to terms with the inevitable. Through a developmental approach, this step presents perspective and opportunity for the individual to discover ways of growing and developing towards a self-determined sense of completion in personal, interpersonal and spiritual realms of life (Byock, 2000). During this last stage of li fe, palliative care of terminally ill patients allows growth and a sense of closure between patients and families, both individually and together (Byock, 2000).These patients are offered not only relief from pain and other symptoms, but also psychological and emotional support from psychologists and counsellors for them and their families (WHO, 2011). For terminally ill patients, palliative care offers quality of life treatments both at the hospital and at home such as nursing, supportive therapy, and physiotherapy, and so forth Simoens et, al. 2010). Aged patients generally choose palliative care over curative despite the fact that their illness may be curable. The suffering of their family and friends round them generally influences this decision.The Social Cognitive Theory, illustrates how individual aspects as well as environmental factors and human behaviour apply influence upon each other (National Cancer Institute, 2005). Thus careful decision-making needs to be made with th e use up of the aged patient in mind. Palliative care is also highly important for individuals who are not suffering from terminal illnesses, and also for those who take a crap chosen curative methods. It allows them to have a better quality of life throughout the procedure and the recovery period.Without palliative care assisting curative methods, individuals would be unlikely to choose to go through the curative methods knowing there would be a poor quality of life after. In ratiocination through a close analysis of both curative and palliative care, the best approach to health care would be an integration of both methods. Each individual circumstance needs to be looked at holistically. Curative methods are essential in pro-longing an individuals life. However, there is sanctity of life, which needs to be valued.By not providing cure of illness or disease one does not recognise the sanctity of their life. Palliative care is just as important as curative. It is important for pat ients who are not only terminally ill or aged, but those who choose curative methods. By curing a patient, one needs to palliate them by relieving symptoms of possible pain or discomfort. If palliative care is not provided, there would be no point in curing a patient by giving them a poor quality of life. Thus they need to work in conjunction with each other for the most successful results.