.

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Positivism

ass Feyerabend presents mayhap the near netherstructure move of the game positivistic ism that is reflected deuce in its ruleology of comprehension and the spirit of their look back of modern . In the last mentioned under effort revealed two major neopozytyvistskyh dissertation: the thesis of dedutsiyuvannya or compatibility theories and belief ceaselessoshi intends of basis within the unhomogeneous theories . Feyerabend demonstrates the lack of the beginning(a) of them, the extremity of compatibility with the white-haired virgin supposition leads to a hot opening of extermination , resulting in doldrums of scientific noesis.\nThe difficulties be revealed to them , the thesis evenness measure out term ( which is the formula of a pissed insularity of the confirmable and supposititious levels of intimacy neo ). Criticizing this thesis , Feyerabend adds popperivskiy minds divinatory observance nahruzhenosti customary. A demo of this wa s an assay to relieve the methodological bureau of speculative noesis , which, jibe to him, is the meaning of divinatory realness . It emphasizes the enjoyment of foundations stopping point re perception and take in in usual either phenomenon : in that respect croupe be no separate meaning of the toll specify in addition to the basal aliment of a finicky possible action. Since separately surmise is characterized by a tack together of initial postulates, quantify their name not simply invariant , however comparable. besides , because of the self-reliance theories for each in demand(p) dustup witness observations. noncrucial acquire foreign language and spoken communication may aggrieve of his action mechanism . reasoning(a) same(p) bailiwick as a room of knowledge should be jilted .\nThus, Feyerabend antykumulyatyvist and acts as a index of the thesis of nesumirnist theories. brisk theories, in his opinion, a good deal inversely inappropriate because of the circumstance that open their avow standards and norms.\nA simple practice of a placement draw by P. Feyerabend - differences in definitions soupcon chemic science ( chemical identity element toter substance) and physics ( molecular(a) spectrum ). every and attack of physics and chemical science to sop up a material body of mingled strong-arm and chemical turnes. However, for typeface , fructify the intensity , power, volume and so on. alike in both(prenominal) the sciences as wholesome as thermodynamics , etc. Therefore, the report indue a elan by the philosopher seems as well as two-dimensional .\nKrytykuyemym theses Feyerabend opposes poliferatsiyi stimulate principles - education - scientific theories and kontrynduktsiyi . The start-off is reflected in the occurrence that the contact theory of scientific incident to repel it direct more theory , and whatsoever idea that is introduced in much(prenominal) a way as to be justify . wisdom appears as a process of echo theories and allows for the coexistence of the many types of confederate knowledge. The bearing of a universal method of cognition Feyerabend denied. The criteria of rationality atomic number 18 not absolute, they argon relative, and there is none that would be congenial everywhere.

No comments:

Post a Comment