Evaluation of an argument through analysis Essay - 1

Evaluation of an argument through analysis - Essay ExampleTo aggrandize on this judgment, it is refreshed to relate the aspect of apt and irrational factors while the latter can be related to women, it can as well be used to justify why women speak much(prenominal). unreasoning persons tend not to take close precaution while speaking and factors can be related to their superior speaking techniques which in most cases argon situation and theoretically assembled (Holmes, 38). Nevertheless, rational talk attributed to men is ground on attributes of honesty, factual and being concise. However, Holmes argument is not based on the amount of manner of speaking spoken but on the quality of the talk. She challenges women to construct a formidable talk in order to counter balance patriarchy. Primarily, Holmes present women talk based on social factors such as friendship and trivial relationships, compared to male talk which focused on critical global arguments. To justify the above descr iption, it is wise to note that Holmes endeavor is based empirical evidence in critical examination based on science, environment and demagogy principles. The essay has applied unfaltering literature dogmas for instance, of humor, proverbs, imagery/ symbolism, simile/ metaphors and as well borrowing close examples. This essay will counter examine Holmes essay by firstly, close checking on the claim and subsidiary claims. Secondly, the essay will base its principles on hilarious practical evidence presented. Thirdly, the essay will examine on technical launching applied by Holmes primarily focusing on opposing views, credibility, language, organization and the tone of the essay. Finally, the conclusion will establish whether the argument women talk too much is valid. Claim What is the main claim presented in the essay? Is it clearly stated the essay does it reflect the purpose of the essay The main claim in the essay is the argument against the quality of talk compared between sex es and what governs the talk. While men uses talk to exemplify power, women uses talk to express emotions and relations. Women are more than interested on trivial elements for instance, of how the society perceive them as individuals and not what men argues turn out how the society perceive the general concept life and how it affects mankind, what are the necessary changes and solutions to challenges. The essay categorizes men as discreet and in very unique cases they would speak out their problems but women are more interested in speaking out their lives to access comfort. According to Holmes (43), men are interested in presenting a certain social point of view and debating on it, while women are more concerned whether the point of view does directly affect them What are subsidiary claims presented in the essay? In other words what claims are used to keep up the main claim? Are the claims clear and valid? And they related to the main claim? Holmes aggrandizes on the main point o f view, literature aspects have been categorically industrious to empower the main point. Subsidiary claims presented stretch from literature, psychological, gender and biological claims. For instance, according to the essay women are more interested to hear their own voice than the rigourousness of what they are talking about. Consequently, biological claims prove that while a male is developing before conception, the testosterone hormone alters the brain (Brizendine, 2011 56). The hormone is significant in