Genetically Engineered Foods Essay

genetic tout ensembley engineered or genetically modify foods ar foods that are simply the result of alteration in the master key genes of an organism such as a plant or an animal in order to imbibe out a characteristic or trait of the original organism. Because this involves the transfer of genes, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are also known as transgenic organisms (Robert Sacerich-GMO, Genetically Modified Foods and Conspiracy Theories). GE foods tummy be contrasted with original foods which are basically foods which undergo a non-synthetic method of processing before distribution to the public. This issue holds big global enormousness because it is considered to be an alternative to solving the World Hunger crisis by supplying GE foods to countries with an inadequate supply of food (Anup Shah GE Technologies leave alone solve origination hunger Jeffrey Heit, MD-Genetically Engineered Foods ).In this paper, the comparative advantages and disadvantages of distrib uting GE foods to the public w unbalanced be discovered and weighed. The notion of GE applied science being the doctor alternative to solving World Hunger willing also be investigated along with the prospect of use organic food instead of GE food. In the expression, Is GE food safe?, Anup Shah argues that although there is a possibility the use of GE foods can be beneficial to the general public, it cannot be said that this will last forever. The importance of this dilemma is being measured by the fact that there is absolutely no scientific proof at the moment to predict the effects of these crops in the foreseeable future, though we competency know a great deal about their initial benefits to health and industry. David C. Pack agrees with this point of tidy sum and states that man has tampered with the very core of our food supply as part of the continuing quest to out-do God.He goes on to talk about the unpredictability of altering genes. Stating in an typeface that certa in genes from a lurcha fishhave been inserted into tomatoes in order to give them a longer shelf heart and that splicing genetic segments of one species into the genes of another could never occur naturally, he goes on to measure the importance of this issue by comparing data from original research work that had been carried out to determine the proportional advantages of golden rice and soybeans compared to the regular varieties available in the market (David C. Pack -Genetically Engineered Foods why the Controversy?). Jeffrey Heit, MD, in Genetically Engineered Foods confirms that that the use of GE foods might entail a cheap and efficient industrial formation but the public might not benefit from it the way we think it will.For instance, the use of peanut genes in tomatoes might adversely affect muckle allergic to peanuts and tomatoes being irreplaceable ingredients in almost all kinds of curry based foods aggravate the situation. On the other hand, some authors like Amy Nort on argue that Vitamin A deprivation can cause blindness and, because it dampens immune system function, leaves children to a greater extent vulnerable to becoming severely ill from infections. If all children in deprived areas were given enough vitamin A, up to 2.7 million deaths could be prevented each yr according to statistics. Genetically engineered capsules rich in vitamin A could be provided to the children in the aforementioned deprived areas. UNICEF has a program to give young children vitamin A capsules twice a year (one capsule is good for a six-month supply of the vitamin).A range of foods naturally contain vitamin A or vitamin A precursors from liver, fish fossil oil and eggs to spinach, carrots, mango and red peppers. But again, those foods may either be locally unavailable, depend on season, or be priced beyond what most families in growth nations can afford (Amy Norton- Genetically circumscribed rice a good vitamin A source 14 Janice Jones- Advantages & Disadvan tages of Organic Foods). In another bind the author, Bryan Walsh talks about the relationship between humane eggs and the way the laying hens are brought up or bred. He hints at the possibility of there being something worse than genetic engineering at hand, which is the way animals are brought up in farms, more specifically chickens. Hence, if such a relationship exists hence there seem to be more pressing matters at hand than just the apparent side-effects of GE foods (Bryan Walsh-Vital Farms Raising the Ultra-Organic Egg).Christie Wilcox adopts a diverse approach by targeting some of the myths held by people in estimation of organic farming as opposed to genetically engineered farming. She talks about how pesticides are used profusely in organic farming, how organic food is not healthier than GE food and how it is not exemplar for the environment ideas that are common amongst the general public about organic food (Christie Wilcox Myth busting one hundred one Organic Farmin g Conventional Agriculture). Backing up the aspect that genetically engineered foods are unsafe and should not be distributed to the general public since their after effects have not yet been discovered, Anup Shah states in an article how worldwide polls indicate a high public demand of judgeing GE food so as toenable the public to choose their preference of food.She points out that all failure to do so implies that the public is ignorant. Is it justified to keep the public in the dark just because we think the public is withal ignorant to grasp the significance of GE food? On the other hand, is it okay to not label food as genetically engineered or not genetically engineered because of the growing apprehension that there will be competition between GE based and non GE based food companies? ( Anup Shah- Public Concerns and Protests on GE Food). While some believe that genetically engineered foods are generally regarded as safe. There has been no adequate testing, however, to ens ure complete safety. There are no reports of illness or injury receivable to genetically engineered foods (Jeffrey Heit, MD- Genetically engineered foods). On the very other end, some people believe that genetically engineered technology is our only hope in abating the ongoing World Hunger bother. However, some people disagree.The idea that genetically engineered technologies can solve world hunger is unreliable. It might have the potential to abet the developing nations in fighting the food crisis but it is amongst the many other alternatives present. A significant number of people in the third world countries are unable to get food because it is expensive, not because it is unavailable. As we can see, the issue of a countrys economy is closely tied with the world hunger problem in this case (Anup Shah- GE Technologies will solve world hunger). There are various questions we command to ask ourselves if we want to determine the safety GE food to human beings. In the event that th is technology achieves its current aim, who will benefit more, people in need or the people who need more? If we are not able to predict the potential side effects of genetically engineered food, is it safe to get off this one chance to revert poverty or even world hunger for that matter?If not, thusly will not taking the leap be worth it in the long run? wiz reason why GE technology is being given the go-ahead is that there is a split of money and profit involved in this. Hence from a business perspective it is more favorable, for example to produce crops that can be resistant to your pesticides (so that you can apply more of them). Keeping this perspective in mind, is it moral to jeopardize the prospect of hunger free countries? Does the expression man tampering with nature also apply to scenarios in which Genetic engineering has helped the human race develop the food market? (David C. Pack-GeneticallyEngineered Foods why the Controversy? David C. Pack)The author mentions how the cross breeding of seeds needs to be prevented so as to prevent any food anomalies in the industry. Considering how different animals like cows and buffaloes are cross-bred, how justified is it to combine and merge the habits of different animals who are otherwise different in various aspects? Whereas the problem of World Hunger is concerned, if it cannot be solved by GE crops and is linked to poverty instead, will the eradication of poverty solve the predicament of world hunger?If hunger is an effect of poverty where poverty is a political and economic issue hence politics influences how it is produced who it is produced by and for what purposes it is produced. David C. Pack would also agree Even the problem of world hunger cannot be solved development this technology since the yield of GM crops is even lesser than that of natural (regular) crops (David C. Pack -Genetically Engineered Foods Why the Controversy?). In conclusion, nothing can be said with absolute certainty about the pros and cons of using this kind of technology but what can be done in this field is research in order to determine the magnitude of change it is capable of delivering in the long run.ReferencesAlexandra Sifferlin -California fails to pass genetically modified foods labeling initiative http//healthland.time.com/2012/11/07/california-fails-to-pass-gm-foods-labeling-initiative/ Amy Norton Genetically modified rice a good vitamin A source http//www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ news/fullstory_128308.html Anup Shah -Is GE Food Safe?http//www.globalissues.org/article/189/is-ge-food-safeAnup Shah -GE Technologies will solve world hunger http//www.globalissues.org/article/xcl/ge-technologies-will-solve-world-hunger Anup Shah -Public Concerns and Protests on GE Foodhttp//www.globalissues.org/article/196/a-huge-wave-of-public-concern Bryan Walsh -Vital Farms Raising the Ultra-Organic Egg http//science.time.com/2012/10/22/vital-farms-raising-the-ultra-organic-egg/