Paradox, in individual assertions and the tender system as a whole, pervades the comments of tribulation in Paul Celans meter In assess of Distance. For Celan, lamentation tell ons non completely a personal dilemma just now excessively a metaphysical crisis in the coitionship amidst an I and a you. Through conundrum, Celan describes a shoes of bellow that switchs the significance of furiousness and the termination of a nonher and that calls into question the system of logical systemal system of indistinguishability whose staple fibre nonion posits personal individuation element operator as self-importance-directed, radically individuated ingrainedness. The first stanza reveals the poems stupid structure and this structures kindred with the cardinal universes of identity treated in the poem. In the pass of your eye lives the sn bes of the fishermen of the inner ear sea. In the engineer of your eyeball the sea holds its hollo (1-4). The dickens bodies of water, the wellhead of your eye and the labyrinth sea, symbolize twain conceptions of identity. In the labyrinth sea, identity is a matter of individuated, set-apart entities floating separately. As the fishermen atomic number 18 an contrive for this judgement of subjectiveness, their snareticuloendothelial system fight down a disposition of the unaffectionate subjectivities for a coming to besother. How ever, flush if this singular advise of catching all(prenominal) other unites the fishermen in a divided out goal, this is l championsome(prenominal) possible if wiz presupposes a profound pause amid people. The labyrinthine difficulty is how subjectivities, which are in essence discriminate, could ever come together. In the labyrinth sea, melancholy would be a f moldor, through empathy, for people to plug into to one a nonher, a pith to bridge the rift, yet for Celan, in the introduction of the alternate(a) of the headsprin g, affliction as a means of relating what! is essentially disjointed is inadequate. The watchword of the labyrinth sea is the promise of a relation or alignment between subjectivities, further this promise is realizable exactly in the fountainhead of your eyes. I will examine the aspects of this subjectiveness below, and here I note that the idea of subjectiveness in the wellspring of your eyes seeks to sequestrate a different presupposition concerning identity, one that does not receive with the presupposition of separation. However, this other idea of subjectivity is unable to free itself all in all from the logic of isolated subjectivity. That logic of identity is the ever-present backdrop against which the problemes of the poem take their sense. Thus, Celan employs a foolish structure to chip in a minimal space of critique inside that logic. The structure of In Praise of Distance is paradoxical in that the poem is a description of the teary, mournful glance of another. As a description of the w ellspring of your eyes, the poem seeks to do what is impossible inside the logic of identity, which posits identity to be isolated and impenetrable. A fundamental buy the farm together between subjectivities is of necessity presupposed for the hap of Celans description. Celan scissures grief, the wellspring of your eyes, as the site of blast and paradox that reveals this fundamental bond between people. The relation between this paradoxical structure and the two conceptions of identity can be witnessed in the relation between the wellspring and the sea. With the logic of identity as represented by the sea, the introductory notion is the individuation of subjectivity. However, by naming the content for regret a wellspring, Celan asserts that the personal credit line or question of subjectivity is not isolation and individuation but a fundamental bond where in that location can only be an I in relation to a you. inside the paradoxical structure launched in the first stanza, the following stanzas offer a seri! es of paradoxical assertions that describe aspects of the different idea of subjectivity. These paradoxical assertions must be read for their dual significance in the logic of isolated subjectivity and in Celans tenor of this logic in paradox. In the second stanza, Celan uses compulsive impairment and hyperbole to characterize subjectivity as conceived in the space of trouble. Blacker in black, I am to a greater issue naked. Unfaithful I am honest. I am you when I am I (5-7). Against the logic of identity, where naked, admittedly, unfaithful, I, and you are absolute or scoop of their opposites, Celan uses the equipment casualty to assert that the basis of subjectivity is not its exclusivity, but a seemingly impossible originary bond with it counterpart. For the logic of identity, universe more than than naked is not achievable; there, cosmos naked is subjectivity stripped of all relations and social qualifications, the pure self. But in the wellspring of your eyes, s ubjectivity is more than naked, more than a pure self in isolation, in that, here, nakedness is a fundamental exposure to and impinging with the gaze of another, a you. Furthermore, this organism more naked takes power within the space of mourning and also represents not an autonomous self but an indigent and distress one. Similarly, to be true to oneself requires that one be unfaithful to that very idea of a true self, if that true self is conceived as isolated from you. The utmost paradox of the stanza, I am you when I am I (7), emphasizes that this is not an easy paradox. For these assumes to be intelligible, one must keep the handed-down logic of identity where I and you nurse a lawful place and meaning, yet one must also embody the radical paradox that opens a way to the relation of the terms. As a simple reflection on indexical audience the line can be rewritten: I am a you to you when I am an I to me. In this, I and you only have meaning and re ference in a concrete situation of discourse, and the! terms can relate subjectivities in their replacability through pronouns and their connection in discourse. However, this does not account for the unintelligible manifestation of the paradox, which risks nonsense in the conflation of an I and a you. There, the paradox bitifests a mutual identity between I and you, such(prenominal) that the publicize naked truth of subjectivity is a paradoxical wellspring or origin of subjectivity where the identities and fates of I and you arise and go down together. The wellspring of your eyes is the space of mourning that reveals this conflation of I and you in a fundamental and passe-partout bond. It is a capacity for mourning so deep as to experience the slimy and final examinatione of another as ones own.         Stanzas three and four-spot come up this paradoxical reflection on subjectivity. Stanza three reads: In the wellspring of your eyes/ I drift and dream by robbery (8-9). Here the I of the logic of identity, the individuated I, manifests some of its main moments as characterized in the poem: drifting, like the boat of a fisherman, in itself, separated from others and dreaming, another reference to what one should only be able to do alone, what can only later be related to another. These, for the logic of identity, epitomize what is the sole(a) state and res publica of the individual in isolation. However, in the space of mourning, the individuality of these terms are said to be robbery. That is, the claim that ones self is ones exclusive and fundamental possession is a wrongful taking-possession of p circuitrty that is not ones own. Here, Celan introduces the issue of force-out in his reflection on subjectivity. The claim for individuated subjectivity is not an innocent affair but is seen as an act of vehemence. If I am you when I am I (7), if I and you are basically together, hence the assertion of subjective liberty and individuation, the basic m ove of the logic of identity, proceeds from an origin! of rage, a rending of the mutual identity of I and you.
         Stanza four revisits the imagination of fishermen and snares and recasts the most worthy impulse of the logic of identity they represent, the desire for connection, in a mold that connotes the inevitable violence of the presupposition of separation. It reads: a snare captures a snare/ we part entwined (10-11). The image of snares capturing each other, an image of forceful conquest, evidences that regular(a)tide the best intentions of the logic of identity are condemned to cast both relation between subjectivities as, in essenc e, a form of war. The image of fishermen who wield the snares represents the subjectivities in question. Their encounter is not the meeting of a hunter and his flow but of two hunters, so that, in the logic of identity, even the empathy of mourning that relates isolated subjectivities is a competition and a violence, in that it subordinates the sufferer to the statuesque character of the mourner. The space of this mourning is at a dishonor place the control of the mourner and is doubly hazardous in this subordination, as well as in the original violence of the presumption of the separation, actually a rending, of isolated identities.         The final stanza reads: In the wellspring of your eyes/ a hanged man strangles the rope (12-13). These lines reveal what is at stake in Celans reflections on subjectivity, the possibility of an alternation in the significance of violence and the remainder of another. In this final repeat of the phrase In the wellspring o f your eyes, Celan highlights the necessity of an a! lternative sentiment on identity to cope with and understand violence. As we have seen, the conception of subjectivity in the logic of identity is predicated upon an original act of violence. Thus, with such a violent aegis, the logic of identity is incapable of coping with or understanding violence in a non-violent manner. Consistent with this logic, the image of the hanged man represents every I and you as posited by that logic, isolated, alone, and suffocating under these conditions. With this logic, ensuant to its violent assumption of individuation, the suffering of another would be fundamentally take from the mourner and an optional affective disposition. In this conception of mourning, even if I choose to be concerned with your suffering, this does not alter the original violent presupposition of your status as a hanged man or individual, so that even the empathy of this mourning perpetuates a violence similar to that which it mourns. With this, a hanged man begi ns and is destined to prevail a hanged man. However, in the wellspring of your eyes, in the space of mourning that Celan describes, there is a reversal in the status of the hanged man, which follows from a reversal in the conception of subjectivity. If, as Celan has asserted antecedently in the poem, subjectivity is not originary individuation, but a being more than naked as exposure to suffering and death in an originary bond and mutual identity between I and you, then the suffering and death of the hanged man and every you is the suffering and death of every I, in that I and you are necessarily entwined. In the wellspring of your eyes, in this mourning, Celan finds a testimony to such a fundamental bond. Here, the hanged man is not fulfilling a pot of being hanged, and the mourning of his death is neither optional nor mushy but necessary, as the fate of I and you is a shared fate, as I am you when I am I (7). This mourning, in itself, does not change the v iolence inflicted, but it does dispense with it to b! e seen from a non-violent perspective and in doing so does not sanction one to be indifferent to it. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment